Huh, well I know nothing of Super B-Daman. I'm a primarilly Battle B-Daman & Crossfight B-Daman guy. I do, however, like the evolution of Tamago's B-Daman, they are pretty cool. The only thing that throws me off about them is that they all have 05 on there head (except Spike=Phoenix, thank god).
Yeah, I made 15 edits on various pages. Some of them I made 1 or 2 edits on the same page, so? Are you saying you never make multiple edits in a row on pages? I make some edits, stop, look it over and make more if needed.
True... I was lucky to find a Break Ogre & Gill Scorpion awhile back, but I haven't had any luck on the ones I really want (Mega Diabros & Revolver Hades). However I do really like the new series... I just wish I could find a way to get Spike=Phoenix.
Toatally, I saw the same thing. They were asking for like $400! AND that same seller was asking about the same amount for a Cobalt Saber Fire! ...I wish there were some more sensible people on Amazon/eBay. But you know what's weird? I've been trying to resell a Drive=Garuburn on eBay for about $19.80 and considering I'm shipping it from the U.S. it's a good deal, but nobody seems to be interested. I also checked and saw that a Japanese seller sold the same one for more than what I'm asking not too long ago...
And Ed is completely correct. Yes, multiple edits will boost your achievement meters, but what good does it do? Wikia has a global policy against badge-boosting which, if it wasn't in place, everyone would be nit-picking edits.
I know it's enjoyable getting achievements, but there isn't any pride in getting them by essentially cheating, nor any acknowledgement from others.
I'm not trying to be rude at all, I'm just enforcing a rule.
-_- I know your not rying to be rude. I just don't see there being any issue with it. EdBoy, I'm sorry, but could you try to be a little more resonable with your tone? I don't think it's necessary to bold or add specific indications (This) when I'm simply asking for the reasoning behind Mana's message.
Yes, occasional spelling mistakes with one word are okay, but they shouldn't happen frequently; the edits on Terry's article could have easily been done in one edit, not nineteen as it currently stands. And even so, when a spelling mistake is corrected, it should be marked as a minor edit.
Just, start grouping multiple edits to a page together. Two, maybe three edits is fine, but not nineteen.
Computer Bug wrote:
EdBoy, I'm sorry, but could you try to be a little more resonable with your tone? I don't think it's necessary to bold or add specific indications (This) when I'm simply asking for the reasoning behind Mana's message.
Bolding may be unnecessary, but it delivers a stronger sense of my point and highlights the most important fragments.
The indications within the parenthesis I used were only for this specific case; I don't regularly use them.
Anyway, at least this was solved and we can all forget about this and move on.
Well thank you. It was mostly the specific indications. They give the same impression as though you were saying them behind a cough. But thanks for apologizing, I apologize for taking it the wrong way... and any other thing I've taken the wrong way... I don't really communicate over wikia's that much